As always Amr, thanks for looking after me, and per your suggestion, I am reposting my perspectives with reference numbers for easier identification. I am including as well the instructions for my project package (It's included in the package, but I just wanted to make sure).
1. “You have tremendous exuberance and energy” 2. The walkway • Your diluting yourself • Problematic on so many levels • Will become a gather area but not how you are envisioning it • It would need a stronger reason to be accomplished – no one would ever go for building it 3. If your idea is about gathering, why would you disconnect the bridge from the building? 4. Perspectives • Overall perception is PC, not Apple – capable of attachments • “The Zen of apple is simplicity and I see a lot of gizmos” • You get a sense of power from the perspectives which is contradictory to Apple • #9 looks like a different building – interesting but it is a view most people would never see • #8 opposite – power – big blue inserting itself into Copley Square – it is too corporate. 5. Ted’s comments • It is oppressive • There are different types off embrace - There is my big uncle’s embrace and then my 5 year old daughter’s embrace. Your building is like my uncle who embraces too strongly. • The building works hard to address the corner, but it doesn’t address the interior side of the corner. – The store is being rejected. • You have addresses the pedestrian response without addressing their interior experience. • The light suggestion of the ribbon – other moved need to be as light as this • The window that looks back @ Newbury is inviting an occupant to have a view of the city – light and gentle. • Your packaging is successful 6. Comp. exploded myth of centralized power • You could have power anywhere • Where context is undisturbed by presence of Apple. 7. It’s about restraint • You are at the corner screaming • You are playing the music too loud 8. “I can accept theoretical projects” • but the rigor and thoroughness needs to be constrained 9. The facility is not as matched as the rigor of producing drawings 10. You need to Simplify.
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
2 comments:
Gus,
Nice work! I think you have a beautiful project. Congratulations!
1. “You have tremendous exuberance and energy”
2. The walkway
• Your diluting yourself
• Problematic on so many levels
• Will become a gather area but not how you are envisioning it
• It would need a stronger reason to be accomplished – no one would ever go for building it
3. If your idea is about gathering, why would you disconnect the bridge from the building?
4. Perspectives
• Overall perception is PC, not Apple – capable of attachments
• “The Zen of apple is simplicity and I see a lot of gizmos”
• You get a sense of power from the perspectives which is contradictory to Apple
• #9 looks like a different building – interesting but it is a view most people would never see
• #8 opposite – power – big blue inserting itself into Copley Square – it is too corporate.
5. Ted’s comments
• It is oppressive
• There are different types off embrace - There is my big uncle’s embrace and then my 5 year old daughter’s embrace. Your building is like my uncle who embraces too strongly.
• The building works hard to address the corner, but it doesn’t address the interior side of the corner. – The store is being rejected.
• You have addresses the pedestrian response without addressing their interior experience.
• The light suggestion of the ribbon – other moved need to be as light as this
• The window that looks back @ Newbury is inviting an occupant to have a view of the city – light and gentle.
• Your packaging is successful
6. Comp. exploded myth of centralized power
• You could have power anywhere
• Where context is undisturbed by presence of Apple.
7. It’s about restraint
• You are at the corner screaming
• You are playing the music too loud
8. “I can accept theoretical projects”
• but the rigor and thoroughness needs to be constrained
9. The facility is not as matched as the rigor of producing drawings
10. You need to Simplify.
Post a Comment